Silver inches toward central bank reserve status as its historic rally cracks

Sun Oct 18 2026

 

Russia has indicated plans to spend close to $535 million accumulating silver and other precious metals for its reserves. Saudi Arabia has reportedly joined in, even though Basel rules still deny silver gold's Tier 1 status.

 

Gold has been a Tier 1 reserve asset since 1988. Silver never has been, but after a rally that took it from $24 an ounce to roughly $121 and then nearly cut it in half, central banks and bullion dealers are starting to ask why not.

 

Silver is trading near $60 an ounce this month, still clawing back ground after the metal's worst single day on record. That January 2026 crash, which StartupFortune covered as gold and silver's biggest one-day reversal in years, followed a stretch where silver had more than quadrupled off its 2024 lows before topping out near $121 an ounce. Gold, meanwhile, has settled into the $4,100 to $4,200 range over the same stretch.

 

What's new is the conversation happening underneath the price swings. Gold has carried Tier 1 status under the Basel Capital Accords since 1988, meaning banks can hold it at a 0% risk weight, the same treatment as cash. Silver has never had that status, and still doesn't. But the same forces pushing central banks to stockpile gold — a desire to hold hard assets outside the dollar system — are now spilling into silver, and a handful of monetary authorities are treating it less like a leftover industrial metal and more like a reserve candidate.

 

The European Central Bank estimated that gold made up 27% of official global reserve assets at the end of 2025, overtaking U.S. Treasuries, which sat at 22%. Silver isn't part of that conversation in any official sense. The London Bullion Market Association and the World Gold Council have spent years lobbying for gold to also count as a High-Quality Liquid Asset under Basel III, a stricter standard than Tier 1 that would let banks count it more freely against short-term liquidity requirements. That fight is still unresolved for gold. Silver isn't even in the room.

 

Here's the real distinction, and it's one retail investors chasing the squeeze often miss: there is no lender of last resort for silver. When gold gets tight, a central bank can lease reserves into the market or lend from its vault. When silver gets tight, as it did in London this year, nobody with a mandate steps in. Shrinking London inventories widened the arbitrage spread against New York for weeks, intensifying a short squeeze that traders had to cover themselves, with no institutional backstop in sight.

 

Silver spiked to $59.52 an ounce this week as the Iran ceasefire collapsed, then slipped back below $60, but the real story is a widening supply deficit driven by AI data centers, EVs and solar. J.P. Morgan sees silver averaging $81 in 2026, more than double last year.

 

That's also why roughly half of annual silver demand still comes from solar panels, EVs, semiconductors and AI data center hardware, not vaults. Silver is an industrial metal with a monetary side hustle, while gold is the reverse.

 

 Who's actually buying, and why it matters

 

Russia has been the clearest signal of a shift. The Russian government has indicated plans to spend close to $535 million accumulating precious metals, including silver, for its national reserves under its 2025–2027 federal budget. Saudi Arabia has also been named among sovereign buyers adding silver alongside gold. Neither country has declared silver a formal reserve asset the way gold is treated. What they're doing is simpler, and more telling: hedging currency exposure with a metal that's historically traded alongside gold but still sells at a fraction of the price per ounce.

 

Sprott Asset Management, in its 2026 outlook, points to the same macro forces driving gold — central bank buying, inflation concern, and worry about currency debasement — as now bleeding into silver demand. That's a different story than the retail squeeze narrative that dominated headlines when silver spiked past $100. A hedge fund or a sovereign wealth fund quietly adding silver to a reserve basket doesn't move the price the way a short squeeze does. But it also doesn't unwind in a week.

 

Goldman Sachs is still telling clients to be careful here. The bank cut its gold price target for the end of 2026 to $4,650 an ounce while keeping a $5,400 target for the end of 2027, and flagged that the London silver shortage is amplifying volatility, advising investors who can't stomach swings to stay cautious on silver specifically. JPMorgan, on the other hand, is leaning bullish on the whole complex, forecasting enough combined central bank and investor demand to push gold to $6,300 by year's end.

 

That split matters more than either number alone. Goldman is describing a market where the structural case is real but the near-term mechanics are broken. JPMorgan is betting the structural case wins out regardless. Both can be right at different time horizons: that's exactly the tension an investor staring at a roughly 50% pullback from January's highs has to sit with.

 

The "tier one asset" framing circulating in bullion research right now is getting ahead of the policy reality. No central bank has filed paperwork proposing silver for the same Basel treatment as gold, and nobody at the Federal Reserve or the ECB is drafting one. What's actually happening is narrower, and more interesting: a handful of reserve managers are treating silver as a cheaper, higher-beta way to express the same dollar-hedging trade that's already pushed gold to records.

 

That's not a formal reserve upgrade.

It's a bet that if gold keeps working as a hedge, silver's industrial demand and its tighter physical market could make it work even harder, for anyone willing to stomach the swings on the way there.

 

Source: https://startupfortune.com/